The High Renaissance

Masaccio. (c 1427) The Holy Trinity. Niche Fresco.	Masaccio. (ca. 1427). The Tribute Money.  Fresco	Fra Angelico. (1428). The Annunciation.Tempera on panel.

Now step along a few Florentine blocks to the monastery of San Marco in which the monk Fra Angelico continued the exploration of perspective. His Anunciation celebrated the moment of Christ’s conception as a remedy for Adam and Eve’s fall into sin, depicted in the left third of the fresco. Symbolically, Linear Perspective saves the world from sin. That ray of light is the Holy Spirit impregnating Mary with a divine child, Christians’ Savior.

During the early Renaissance, a mania broke out for mathematically precise Linear Perspective. Architecture and landscapes offers the readiest subject matters for lines converging on a vanishing point in a deep distance. However, increasing sophistication in evoking Depth of Field also enhanced the Mimetic precision of organic objects, including human figures:

Andrea Mantegna. (1490). Dead Christ. Tempera on canvas	Albrecht Dürer. (1538). Perspective Drawing. Woodcut

Renaissance painters enhanced the naturalistic accuracy of their figures through Foreshortening. As we see in the Dürer woodcut, they devised drawing machines with gridlines to precisely capture not just the outline, but also the depth of their subjects, often human models.

Van Eyck: Oil Paint Pioneer

Jan van Eyck was a Flemish master patronized by the emerging wealth of Northwestern Europe. In his Madonna of the Fountain, we see the Renaissance transformation of Byzantine tradition. The figures are standard fare: Madonna, Christ child, adoring angels. But, the figures are located in a specific garden with a contemporary fountain. And the Pathos of mother and child emerge from a moment of active, adoring intimacy.

Virgin of the Fountain  (1439). Oil on oak.

Do you notice the medium of van Eyk’s Virgin of the Fountain: “oil on panel”? Citations for our images of art generally include this information. Why?

Well, the Medium is always a crucial part of an artistic work. We focus on a painting’s image, but it is composed of materials and technique. And the materials not only constrain the technique, but also form part of our experience. “From the late twelfth to the early sixteenth centuries,” most European painters worked in “egg tempera, in which the pigments of the paint are mixed (or ‘tempered’) with egg yolks.” Tempera provided a “vivid and luminous” effect, but was limited in color options” (Tempera). It also dried fast, restricting brushwork and texture. Jan van Eyck was among those who pioneered a new medium: oil paint.

Portrait of a Man with a Red Turban. (1433). Oil on Oak.	Gonella, Court Dwarf of Dukes of Ferrara.  (1433). Oil on oak.	Arnolfini Portrait.  (1434). Oil on Panel.

Now, van Eyck didn’t simply pioneer oil paint. He richly explored the interplay of light and space in our vision. In Van Eyck’s  so-called Wedding Portrait[3]  of the Arnolfinis, notice the domestic details: the dress of a wealthy merchant and his wife, the furniture, the drapery, the slippers in the corner, the terrier. Notice the Linear Perspective of the walls and floorboards. And do you see the convex mirror on the back wall? It presents the reverse image of what we see! Renaissance painters loved to play with sight lines and visual effects.

Sandro Botticelli: Piety and Myths

Few artists live out the Renaissance tensions between religious and secular commitments more dramatically than does Sandro Botticelli. The Florentine master was patronized by the wealthy and powerful Medici family in Florence, and spent his life in the city. As was the norm, “the bulk of his work was devoted to religious subjects,” However, Botticelli “also painted portraits and allegorical, literary, and mythological themes” (Botticelli, Sandro). Above, we explored Botticelli’s Adoration of the Magi last week, noting the fusion of religious subjects with contemporary figures, including Medici patrons. This time, notice the architecture’s linear perspective, contemporary in design but ruined to suggest antiquity.

The Adoration of the Magi. (1478). Tempera.	Madonna and Child with Saint John the Baptist. (1468). Tempera and oil on panel.	Portrait of Man Wearing a Medal of Cosimo the Elder. (1474). Tempera.

At first glance, the Madonna and Child above may seem the same old thing. But notice that this moment of child care is set, not in a timeless heaven, but in a specific moment of time and in a specific place. Byzantine Madonnas  frequently added saints out of time, but John the Baptist here is a young lad. When we remember that he was Jesus’ older cousin (Luke 1), the moment becomes a specific memory of shared childhood.

Now consider his facial features. Botticelli remains renowned for his “draftsmanship, … an extraordinary combination of delicacy and flowing vitality” (Botticelli, Sandro). Many of his faces achieve a luminous, idealized quality less mimetic than harkening back to Greek ideals of proportion and elegance. In his idealized portrait, a young aristocrat wears a medallion of Botticelli’s Medici masters.

We see further Classical influence in the mythological paintings that Botticelli painted for the private enjoyment of his patrons. The Medici richly enjoyed humanistic literature and would have been familiar with Ovid and other Classical mythographers. So Botticelli sometimes set aside the task of illustrating Christianity to paint visions of a mythic world.

Botticelli, Sandro. (1478). La Primavera.[4] [The Allegory of Spring]. Tempera on panel

La Primavera could not have been painted in pre-Humanist Catholic Europe. It depicts, not a biblical scene, but a seasonal transformation as conceptualized in Classical myth. This image would never be commissioned for a church. It was patronized by private, Medici wealth and reflected the new dissemination of Greek mythology. From this point on, sophisticated people would have to know Ovid as well as the Bible to understand art. Can you make out any of the figures?

Who is the woman in the center? No, it is not Mary.[5] This is Venus, the Roman name for Aphrodite, Greek goddess of love. Her son, Cupid (Eros) hovers above her while Mercury[6] looks skyward and the Three Graces[7] celebrate new life. To the right, a mythic miracle unfolds before our eyes. The blue figure is Zephyrus. personification of the West Wind. His warming breath transforms Chloris, an incarnation of winter, into Flora, goddess of vegetation.

3. Age of Leonardo and Michelangelo

Leonardo—Renaissance Man

Vasari’s 3rd Renaissance stage is centered on the “big three” among revered artists of the age: Leonardo, Raphael, and Michelangelo. Today, the phrase “Renaissance Man” refers to one blessed with many gifts who achieves greatly in a variety of fields. It derives from the fact that wealthy patrons expected an artist in their employ to be ready to paint, sculpt, plan buildings, design costumes for masques, and more. One Renaissance Man reigned supreme: Leonardo da Vinci.

One of the most widely creative people in human history, Leonardo really did everything, much of it in his mind. He was one of the pre-eminent anatomists of his day, dissecting cadavers to enhance the mimetic accuracy of his sculpture and painting. He sent a letter to the Borgias volunteering to invent new war machines, including helicopters and tanks. Throughout his life, Leonardo sought new designs and techniques, not only for art, but for technology:

Leonardo’s Interests

The interests reflected in the 3,500 pages of Leonardo’s notebooks include anatomy, architecture, astronomy, athletics, botany, color, drawing, geography, geology (including stratigraphy), mathematics, music, optics, painting, perspective, philosophy, sculpture, town planning, zoology, and several branches of engineering (notably hydraulic, nautical, mechanical, military, and structural), but his innovative thinking on these and other subjects made no impact on sixteenth-century culture or science, because there was no public awareness of their existence until 1570. … The notebooks were a mass of notes rather than a series of treatises, a tribute to intelligent curiosity on a heroic scale but not a readily publishable work (Leonardo da Vinci).

Leonardo’s notebooks remained obscure for centuries, in part because he wrote text backwards, a mirror image. However, his now famous sketch of Vitruvian Man shows a mathematical interest in proportion reminiscent of the Greek Ideal.

Vitruvian Man (1492). Pen, ink, water color, paper.	Annunciation. (1472). Oil on panel.	Madonna of the Carnation. ( 1478). Oil on canvas.

Like Fra Angelico’s Annunciation (above), Leonardo’s version depicts the angel informing Mary that she will bear the Christ child. This treatment, however, is one moment of time, not a timeless conflation of many eras. The depth of the painting and the rich naturalism of the landscape gain from masterful Linear Perspective, seen especially in the lines of the building

Like other painters else in his day, Leonardo painted Madonnas enriched by the new interests in naturalism, time and place. His Madonna of the Carnation captures the features of a specific model, dressed in the sumptuous fashions of 16th Century Milan. Foreshortening gives rich contours and textures to the figures, and the Alps rise through the windows of the room.

Leonardo’s Virgin of the Rocks sets new standards for dramatic setting. Behind a family grouping—Mary, an angel, young John the Baptist, and Jesus—looms a forbidding landscape of jagged rock outcroppings. An archway to the left appears to be filled with the teeth of a monster. The background almost overpowers the central grouping of iconic figures. Still, those figures are worthy of notice. They are “composed” (i.e. arranged) in a loose circle defined in part by their eye lines. The figures gaze lovingly at each other, forming an implied ring of intimacy. This effect reveals character (for the Greeks, Ethos) and also operates as a formal design feature, guiding our eyes.

Virgin of the Rocks. (1508). Oil on panel (transferred to canvas).	Mona Lisa. (1503-1506). Oil on panel.

Of course, Leonardo is most famous today for the small portrait—about 30 by 21 inches—that we know as the Mona Lisa, perhaps the most famous painting in the world. But what makes it so special as a painting? Again, it is difficult to get a sense of the painting’s textures and techniques without standing before it. And a good look is hard to achieve. The salon of the Louvre in which the canvas hangs throngs with visitors determined to glimpse the world’s most famous painting.

Everyone speaks of that enigmatic smile and we wonder, as the song goes, what the woman is thinking. We speak of the woman’s enigmatic smile, but notice how the eyes look directly “into the camera,” so to speak. As we just saw, eye lines can open up the inner character and they profoundly affect our own eyes’ processing of the image.

A close look at the Mona Lisa reveals impossibly rich textures, subtle layers of light, shadow, and color. The brushwork is sublime, blending the textures of the woman and of the atmospheric background into a seamless, organic whole without artificially etched contours. Leonardo compared his brushwork to smoke:

Michelangelo: Christian Humanism

Today, the word Humanism is too often associated exclusively with secularist life philosophies. During the Renaissance, learning later labeled as humanist did influence some skeptics.[8] However, most artists, scholars, philosophers, and churchmen of the day fused classical Greek lore with the faith and ideas of the Latin church.

[8] Skeptics: e.g. Giordano Bruno (1548-1600), a Dominican friar and scholar who theorized about cosmic bodies, advocated pantheism and reincarnation, and was executed by the Inquisition for heresy.

This Christian Humanism finds its pinnacle expression, perhaps, in Michelangelo (see this note). The deeply pious artist focused almost exclusively on Biblical themes. However, his sculpture channeled classical Greek principles. He emulates Ideal, Classical anatomy and detailed, meticulously Mimetic modeling of the human body. The drapery in his Pieta rivals the naturalism of the finest Greek sculptors. Through Rhythmos and Pathos, this masterpiece inspires faith and empathy with Mary holding the crucified body of her son. Notice how the living woman holds her body’s weight while the limbs of Jesus’ body hang loose and lifeless.

Pietà. (1498-1500). Marble. St. Peter’s Basilica	David. (1504). Marble.

Michelangelo carved his David for the roof of the Duomo (Cathedral) in Florence. But the people of Florence loved it so much that it was placed on the ground in the Palazzo Vecchio, the city’s central public square. We find again the principles of Greek sculpture: meticulous anatomy,  Rhythmos, Contraposto (uneven distribution of weight on the legs) and ethos (character): the calm, confident gaze of a masterful, born leader.

Of course, this David wears no clothes. Nudes had been unknown in Christianized Europe for nearly 1,000 years. But, embodying the rebirth of Greek classicism, Michelangelo’s predecessor, Donatello, shocked the Renaissance art world when his David wore a floral hat and nothing else. For Michelangelo, the representation of David in the nude was an act of piety. Christian Humanist thought of the day saw human beings as the pinnacle of God’s creation. Michelangelo followed his Greek masters in depicting the male nude as the Greek Ideal of the human form.

Creation of Adam. (1508-1512). Ceiling fresco. Sistine Chapel